We are thrilled to share this guest post with you by Climate Mama extra ordinaire Lauri Kraft and we look forward to sharing future posts with you as well! Lauri and her family are making their way around the world on an amazing environmentally-focused adventure that began in August 2013.
We had the good fortune of meeting Lauri’s husband Larry, an amazing Climate Papa, in person this past summer in Chicago, at a training for Climate Reality leaders. Larry told us that not only will the Kraft family be broadening their own views and understanding of the world on their year long travels, but they are also looking forward to helping others learn more about climate change, water and environmental sustainability as they share their experiences and report back on their adventures and their discoveries.
It’s “Do Something Wednesday” at ClimateMama and we think that Lauri will give you some great “food for thought” and ideas for ACTION too!
OUR PICKY EATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE
by Lauri Kraft
This didn’t start out to be a post about climate change. It began as a post about picky eating.
For those of you who are familiar with Jason and his eating habits, he has (thankfully) added a new food to his repetoire – peanut butter and honey sandwiches. A week ago, he wouldn’t touch peanut butter; now he proclaims it as one of his new favorite things.
This may seem trivial, but with Jason, it’s all about trying to find sources of protein. Vegetarian by choice, he’s been eating lots of plain pasta with butter, flour tortillas, and white rice since we left the States. He eats plenty of fruits and vegetables, but protein is a challenge – so far, it’s been handfuls of nuts, yogurt and milk. At home, he eats a jar of either almond or soy nut butter per week – which are definitely not available on the road.
Our daughter will happily chow down what we call “kid food” in the States – chicken nuggets, grilled cheese sandwiches, pizza, and the occasional carbon-intensive hamburger. Jason? None of the above.
At any rate: we came back through San Jose for a few days before leaving for Peru, and we went to an excellent exhibit on climate change at the National Museum. It led to a side discussion with the kids about how eating less meat, especially beef, is better for the environment and our changing climate. Jason doesn’t like meat. But also, the way he sees it: he likes animals. If he eats meat, there are fewer animals in the world. A sweet six-year-old sentiment — but also a logical argument based in heartfelt emotion, and it’s hard to argue with, even for a meat eater like myself.
Carbon Cost of Protein
At an average of 270 pounds per person, per year, Americans eat more meat per capita than citizens of any other country (except Luxembourg). The USDA recommends an annual maximum of 125 pounds from the entire protein group, including meat and other sources, such as eggs, nuts and soy. World average per capita meat consumption is 102.5 pounds per year, much closer to the USDA recommended max.
Beef is one of the most carbon-intensive foods we can eat. According to the Environmental Working Group (EWG), it generates 27 kilos of CO2 equivalents per kilo of meat consumed (more than twice the emissions of pork, four times more than chicken, and 13 times more than vegetable proteins, like beans). Lamb is even more carbon-intensive – about 50 percent more so than beef.
A big part of meat’s contribution to greenhouse gases is the methane produced by the animals’ digestion and manure. Methane is 25 times more potent than CO2, according to EWG. There are also other environmental impacts from routine use of antibiotics; artificial hormones to promote growth; pesticides and fertilizers used to grow grain for animal feed; and of course, the significant amount of water needed (634 gallons to make one burger).
I knew most of this, but a surprise for me was the CO2 equivalent for cheese — it’s third on the EWG list, behind only lamb and beef. It has a higher carbon footprint than pork or turkey, and twice that of chicken. Other dairy products, such as yogurt or milk, are much less carbon-intensive. Why? Because it takes so much milk to make a pound of cheese – about 10 pounds of milk per pound of cheese.
Over the course of a year, if everyone in the U.S. ate no meat or cheese just one day a week, it would be like not driving 91 billion miles – or taking 7.6 million cars off the road, according to EWG.
Meat and cheese from grass-fed animals is certainly a better choice than grain-fed. However, in Costa Rica, much of the land used for cattle grazing was at one point rainforest. So raising cattle also contributes to deforestation.
And then there’s the personal impact. Numerous studies have found that people with higher intakes of red meat have higher incidences of not just heart diseases, but stroke, diabetes and cancer.
Do I eat meat? I do. I knew meat had a negative environmental impact, so I’ve been eating less than I used to — and much more chicken than beef. But after talking with my little vegetarian about this, and researching this post, I’m going to seek out other sources of protein more often — such as beans in Costa Rica and Peru, where they’re a dietary staple.
I knew there was a reason I liked peanut butter and honey sandwiches.
Lauri Kraft has managed PR for a technology company and performed full-time in musical theatre. For the next year, she and her family of four are on a year-long environmentally-focused trip around the world. In addition to teaching their kids, Lauri and her husband Larry are creating educational content for their kids’ school in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and the 85,000 kids that follow the Wilderness Classroom, a non-profit with whom they are partnered. You can see more on their blog. Their kids, Jamie age 8, and Jason age 6, have their own blog!